Australia takes another backward step on iodization
In August 2006, FSANZ proposed mandatory salt iodization in key cereal foods to address the re-emergence of iodine deficiency in both Australia and New Zealand. Earlier FSANZ sought public comments on universal salt iodization in both countries, an initiative supported by the Salt Institute and the International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders (ICCIDD). Resistance by food processors curtailed the breadth of the requirement. The Salt Institute supported the curtailed effort.
Now, a further retreat. FSANZ announced this week that it now questions the need for universal iodization in Australia because "a degree of geographic variation in the prevalence and severity of iodine deficiency exists across Australia." The health ministry will study the problem until mid-2008.
FSANZ contrasted the situation in Australia with that in New Zealand where
there is general acknowledgement of a population-wide iodine deficiency....Health Ministers have noted that the prevalence and severity of iodine deficiency in New Zealand is significant and that mandatory fortification with iodine is considered that most effective strategy to address it.
The countries share administration of a "Joint Food Standards system" that permits different regulations in the two countries if there are "exceptional health and safety or environmental reasons." FSANZ has made the determination that this "exceptional" situation exists and has finalized a mandate for iodized salt in New Zealand alone.
